tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Oct 29 15:33:11 1993

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Dubghach



> 
> 
> >From: Captain Krankor <krankor@codex.prds.cdx.mot.com>
> >Date: Thu, 28 Oct 93 23:32:07 -0600
> 
> >>>ghoSqa'taH DIS poHvetlh.  Hu'qa'meH HeghwI'mey poH.  
> >>>                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
[...]
> >>never was satisfactorily resolved.  Allowing ambiguity, we could do "poHDaq
> >>Hu'qa'bogh Heghpu'wI'mey".
> 
> >jIHvaD qay'be'.  Qap "Hu'qa'meH Heghpu'wI'mey poH" 'e' vIQub.  vIyajchu'pu'
> >'ej qay'ghach vIleghbe'.  <shrug>
> 
> jI<shrug> jIH je.  wa' loD Soj 'oH latlh tar'e'.
> 

vaj Heghpu'wI' moj 'oH latlh'e'  :)

[...]
> 
> >naDev "give me chocolate" Damugh, 'ach tlhIngan HolDaq "yuch yInob"
> >DaghItlhpu'.  lughchu'be'.  yuch yInob == "Give chocolate".  "Give me
> >chocolate" == "yuch HInob" "jIHvaD yuch yInob" joq.
> 
> bIlugh.

mu'tlheghDaq 'oHba' "jIHvaD" 'e' vIQub.  lojmItDaq ngaSwI' poS ghaj
"Alexander" 'e' luleghDI' 'Iv latlhvaD yuch lunob?

I guess that this could get into whether or not indirect objects are
(or should be) shown in the prefixes.  pab veS vIneHbe'.

> 
> 
> >       --Qanqor
> 
> 
> ~mark

That's my middle name.  Anyway...

> 
> 

Peter Garza
pmgarza@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu



Back to archive top level