tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Oct 08 18:39:27 1993
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: eD ngerwIgholpu' vItamchoHlaw'ta'
- From: Captain Krankor <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: eD ngerwIgholpu' vItamchoHlaw'ta'
- Date: Fri, 8 Oct 93 21:38:24 -0400
>Another question: Concerning what Qanqor commented about the vaguene
>of functiolingon question words, i.e., tha'Iv and nuq follow
>somewhat different rules than other nouns. Well, which of these would
>seem more appropriate?:
>
>- ghorgh 'oHpu' may'
>- ghorgh qaSpu' may'
That's easy, the second. That's because the first is grammatically
incorrect. {{:-) It needs to be: ghorgh 'oHpu' may''e'.
Aside from that, I think I'd still tend to favour the second. This
is one case where I do tend to agree with those who try to limit the
use of "to be" in tlhIngan Hol. But this is just a gut feeling,
nothing more.
--Krankor