tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Nov 17 06:44:36 1993
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Suffixes (Was: <<tlhIngan 'o' Humghach>>vetlh)
- From: [email protected] (Mark E. Shoulson)
- Subject: Suffixes (Was: <<tlhIngan 'o' Humghach>>vetlh)
- Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1993 09:44:03 -0500
- In-Reply-To: Will Martin's message of Tue, 16 Nov 93 16:17:51 EST <[email protected]>
>From: Will Martin <[email protected]>
>Date: Tue, 16 Nov 93 16:17:51 EST
>I completely agree in principal that rovers should be repeatable within
>a word, though for this particular example, I would far prefer jIQuchnISqu'.
>It just seems much more direct, and therefore less likely to start a knife
>fight.
You're right, though I said that I'd use {jIQuchbe'laHbe'} (and I would), I
agree that {jIQuchnISqu'} is *much* more direct and cleaner.
>-- charghwI'
~mark