tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Nov 17 06:44:36 1993

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Suffixes (Was: <<tlhIngan 'o' Humghach>>vetlh)



>From: Will Martin <[email protected]>
>Date: Tue, 16 Nov 93 16:17:51 EST

>I completely agree in principal that rovers should be repeatable within
>a word, though for this particular example, I would far prefer jIQuchnISqu'.
>It just seems much more direct, and therefore less likely to start a knife
>fight.

You're right, though I said that I'd use {jIQuchbe'laHbe'} (and I would), I
agree that {jIQuchnISqu'} is *much* more direct and cleaner.

>--   charghwI'

~mark



Back to archive top level