yIghel! – Ask Questions!

Ask questions and find answers here!

  • enru

    July 7, 2022 at 3:31 am

    I would not use {vuSwI’}. I probably wouldn’t be able to figure out the meaning from simply reading “limiter”.

    Depending on the type of clamp described, I might say {‘uchwI’} “holder”, {‘uchmeH SommI’} “tool for holding”, {‘uchmeH jan} “device for holding”, or in the case of a clamp that operates like a pair of tweezers, {‘uchmeH DaSwI’} “pincher(s) for holding”.

    You might also substitute {vIHbe’meH} ~”for immobility” in those cases with {‘uchmeH} above.

    This idea might be specialized enough to warrant an entry on the chabal tetlh.

  • Daniel

    March 26, 2023 at 6:46 pm

    What do you think of DaSwI’?

Log in to reply.