tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Sep 04 18:13:34 2014
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Sweets
- From: "lojmIt tI'wI' nuv" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Sweets
- Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 21:13:23 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:subject:references:content-type:in-reply-to:message-id:date:to :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=3TqocfWcgXxpl8u6Yc8viABJxk+JNzdT5AzwjS09+VY=; b=nE3C0jinpf6FREZrV45m41sh6K/4bOsWHZPcUG4P+7iCRH6G6v4iIQCGicWSbVGxc3 OwaI9imofLkjhSq6DbZeNZYjz5zEg/0adm+0JyE+1DTeEA5XlDHVeWb85q6cKgk5+HVy OtuGnZGgCY/Sq+oZ6RSzYi1grt7CNLk3+P2zRnFcIrAlg0ZGtrYwGtWOu3ujkTSSF0aY WR1KGOiVxDWv1jWXksoIb5864nFzWpxkWchW18FiJPgsrR56l5mHGQ9jCn8cetQWJkgc yFxV2P9HRHbRkbfu+ZSCiR9alEdiD62Zc43FoA2jcmaC1d7orYj0dm3KPT3RF2rvN9dM 8Vig==
- In-reply-to: <CAFK8js2=F7GYvOG=SAcQMY+iQcoKTHvF6fxBSKqwJxkdTKBkAA@mail.gmail.com>
- List-archive: <http://mail.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol/>
- List-id: <tlhingan-hol.kli.org>
- List-subscribe: <http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
- References: <[email protected]> <CAFK8js2=F7GYvOG=SAcQMY+iQcoKTHvF6fxBSKqwJxkdTKBkAA@mail.gmail.com>
How about {naHlet ngaSbogh yuch} or {naHlet So'bogh yuch}?
Sent from my iPad
> On Sep 3, 2014, at 11:29 AM, Alan Anderson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 6:44 AM, Fiat Knox <[email protected]> wrote:
>> puq Soj - sweets
>> We already have leng Soj from KGT, but "puq Soj" seems more appropriate for
>> this show.
>
> Is the word "sweets" culturally associated specifically with kids'
> food in the UK? I too think first of a children's menu. If it were me,
> I'd just call it {yuch} and be done with it.
>
>> naHlet yuch - chocolate (covered) nuts
>> naHHom yuch - chocolate (covered) raisins
>
> I am more inclined to put the words in the other order. To me, {naHlet
> yuch} is a kind of chocolate associated with nuts (my first impression
> is actually Nutella). On the other hand, {yuch naHlet} is a nut,
> perhaps made from or coated with chocolate. Getting fancier, {yuch yub
> naHlet} seems likely to evoke the right idea.
>
> Raisins aren't {naHHom} in my mind; that would be more like a berry.
> {ghIrep QaD} might be a good way to refer to raisins.
>
> -- ghunchu'wI'
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tlhingan-hol mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol