tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jan 15 09:34:02 2014

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Klingon Word of the Day: Say'qu'moH

David Trimboli ([email protected]) [KLI Member] [Hol po'wI']



<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv=Content-Type></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: Calibri,sans-serif">bIlughbe': pabbej &lt;lo'laHlu'&gt;. &lt;someone/something unspecified is valuable&gt; 'oS.</DIV></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr>
<HR>
<SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: Calibri,sans-serif; FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From: </SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: Calibri,sans-serif"><A href="mailto:[email protected]";>De'vID</A></SPAN><BR><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: Calibri,sans-serif; FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent: </SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: Calibri,sans-serif">‎1/‎15/‎2014 5:25 AM</SPAN><BR><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: Calibri,sans-serif; FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To: </SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: Calibri,sans-serif"><A href="mailto:[email protected]";>tlhIngan-Hol</A></SPAN><BR><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: Calibri,sans-serif; FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject: </SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: Calibri,sans-serif">Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Klingon Word of the Day: Say'qu'moH</SPAN><BR><BR></DIV>&gt;&gt; ja' Ruben Molina:<BR>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; [...]<BR>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Maybe {lo'laH} was related with the "use-value" of a commodity:&nbsp; {lo'laHlu'}<BR>&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt;&gt; ja' De'vID:<BR>&gt;&gt;&gt; 'ach DuHbe' *{lo'laHlu'}. tay'laHbe' {-laH} {-lu'} je.<BR><BR>Quvar:<BR>&gt;&gt; You are right, we cannot use two same type suffixes together in the way that Ruben is using it above. But if I understand the explanation correctly, {lo'laH} "be valuable" is really one verb (quote: "not the verb lo' plus Type 5 suffix"), then it must be okay to say<BR>&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt;&gt; {lo'laHlaH} "it is able to be valuable"<BR><BR>loghaD:<BR>&gt; I believe what De'vID is suggesting that {lo'laH} could not have become itsown stem by that route, since that route wasn't open before it was a verb stem.<BR><BR>DoSwIj DaqIppu'. pabmo', DuHbe' {(lo')(-laH)(-lu')}. 'ach DuHbe' je<BR>{(lo'laH)(-lu')}. *"Someone/something is useful it" 'oS. Dap 'oHba'.<BR><BR>-- <BR>De'vID<BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Tlhingan-hol mailing list<BR>[email protected]<BR>http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol<BR></BODY></HTML>
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol


Back to archive top level