Am 12.12.2014 um 20:13 schrieb Felix Malmenbeck:
He never explicitly call it a <mu' ru'>, but it would seem to fit the description quite well: An ungrammatical construction that got the point across, and highlighted a rather amusing situation.
Indeed: KGT, p. 176, 5.3.3 "Intentional Ungrammaticality":"Sometimes words or phrases are coined for a specific occasion, intentionally violating grammatical rules in order to have an impact."
Probably {pItlhbe'} was not intentional, but as you said, everyone knew what it could mean.
-- Lieven L. Litaer aka Quvar valer 'utlh http://www.facebook.com/Klingonteacher http://wiki.qepHom.de _______________________________________________ Tlhingan-hol mailing list [email protected] http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol