tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Nov 12 13:48:24 2013
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Greetings from Maltz
- From: "De'vID" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Greetings from Maltz
- Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 22:48:10 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=OEOGhku0/zk4N+DXfOP8jDN9xz/WtGj90bOjoHDqP4M=; b=BjmvpTQxCXtZi6n1WoXmy0PDkDijrMbfHZeWFXtbSrtH30zcQLu4GLmX2jsZjcrPDq WGT9Hx22WGL4TAVuns78D/799wwFykNQRLb2r8fFClgRgF/psanG+ytS04Bf6xeetPCw TzJO3qo78byXnEHX+OzUu+I+toc6JzuacG+8FOQpNVvGZjUXvcukDXDvpf+yFwU0XR7N Qg6vdKnWGIwTYoOnJ8UsEllLsPeHq6ikGxX3riwiYczxDIfEpDFmJunBFJWFT92bWiWO YKElJ0AWP1NqIbPEXNKQ0IffivuHdE2uiaFp802pRt3FXnyxw0WIZcH7Q6pYwT9ZEYje QD+A==
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- List-archive: <http://mail.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol/>
- List-id: <tlhingan-hol.kli.org>
- List-subscribe: <http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
- References: <[email protected]>
matlh:
> qepHomDaq ghojwI'pu' chu' tu'lu' 'ej tlhIngan Hol jatlhwI'pu' po'qu' tu'lu'.
qatlh {lutu'lu'} lo'be' matlh?
Curious that Maltz and Marc Okrand seem to make the same grammatical
errors, or, if they are not errors (*cough* *cough*), then the same
intentional deviations from "textbook grammar". I guess since Marc
learned Klingon from Maltz he must have picked up his bad habits.
Say, has anyone ever seen them both in the same room at the same time?
(Has any reason ever been given why {tu'lu'} is sometimes used when
the grammar demands {lutu'lu'}, or is it just one of those things
which happen but are never explained?)
--
De'vID
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol