On 8/21/2013 4:44 PM, De'vID wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Fiat Knox <[email protected]> wrote:For a time, I found myself asking whether there was a Klingon term for "canon." Then I thought: use {mub} legal, be legal (v) for canon and {Hat} illegal, be illegal (v) for non-canon. Does that work for anyone else?Canon has to do with more than just legality though: it has to do with the existence of a {chovnatlh'a'}.
Yes, "canon" refers to the body of sources that is considered authentic or authoritative. Something that is "non-canon" is not illegal; it's just not accepted as a genuine part of that body.
-- SuStel http://www.trimboli.name/ _______________________________________________ Tlhingan-hol mailing list [email protected] http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol