tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon May 21 00:18:55 2012

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] 'e'mo'

Felix Malmenbeck ([email protected])



> Yes, it works for {-mo'}. I think that's what I ended up saying.
> However, it doesn't work for other suffixes, like {-DI'}.

{ngugh} should work for {-DI'}. -pa', -taH-vIS and -meH are trickier, though. I'd probably go with using something like {qaS[pa'/taHvIS/meH]}. May br cases where that wouldn't work, though.

________________________________________
From: De'vID jonpIn [[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 08:21
To: KLI
Subject: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] 'e'mo'

De'vID:
>> Because when I'm speaking, I sometimes finish saying something before I realise I wanted to
>> make it the first part of a longer sentence, and I don't want to start over.

loghaD:
> What about {vaj}?

Yes, it works for {-mo'}. I think that's what I ended up saying.  However, it doesn't work for other suffixes, like {-DI'}.

--
De'vID


_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol



Back to archive top level