tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun May 20 15:19:26 2012

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] 'e'mo'

ghunchu'wI' ([email protected])



On May 20, 2012, at 10:24 AM, "De'vID jonpIn" <[email protected]> wrote:

> ghunchu'wI':
>> Why not just put the suffix on the verb and not use {'e'} at all?
> 
> If I was writing and could revise my sentence, that's what I would do.
> This came up because I wanted to say something, and I'd already said
> the first sentence, paused, and then I realised I wanted to add {-mo'}
> to the first verb and continue with a second part.  I wondered if I
> could've salvaged the situation by continuing {'e'mo'...}

Same question: why not put {-mo'} on the verb? If, for example, you had said {paqwIj tlhappu' jIlwI'}, you could then finish the thought with {tlhapmo' vIlaDlaHbe'} instead of a pseudogrammatical {'e'mo'}.

-- ghunchu'wI'
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol



Back to archive top level