tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue May 01 14:24:37 2012
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Question regarding purpose clauses
>> QI'tu'Daq maHlaw'taH. maHeghpu' qIt'a'?
> However, this sentence doesn't have {-meH}. Also, I think the {qIt}
> is extraneous: {maHeghpu''a'} does just as well, and it is
> unambiguously grammatical. I don't see what your sentence adds, other
> than apparent grammatical violation.
Oops; I meant for it to say <maHeghpu'meH qIt'a'>.
>> wej pa' pawmeH vay' DuH'a'?
> I have no idea how to parse this. It's gibberish to me.
That's extremely interesting; it's meant to say "Is it possible that nobody's arrived there yet?".
________________________________________
From: De'vID jonpIn [[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 23:20
To: tlhIngan-Hol
Subject: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Question regarding purpose clauses
ghunchu'wI':
>> Your sentences with {DuH} and {qIt}
>> seem like complete gibberish to me, and I'm not sure what you intend
>> them to mean.
loghaD:
> That's VERY interesting to hear, since they come extremely naturally to me.
>
> Assuming you're talking about these two:
>
> QI'tu'Daq maHlaw'taH. maHeghpu' qIt'a'?
"We're apparently in paradise. Is it possible that we've died?"
({QI'tu'} is the source of creation though; {Suto'vo'qor} is where
honourable warriors go when they die, and {ghe'tor} the dishonourable
ones.)
However, this sentence doesn't have {-meH}. Also, I think the {qIt}
is extraneous: {maHeghpu''a'} does just as well, and it is
unambiguously grammatical. I don't see what your sentence adds, other
than apparent grammatical violation.
loghaD:
> wej pa' pawmeH vay' DuH'a'?
I have no idea how to parse this. It's gibberish to me.
--
De'vID
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol