tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Mar 27 07:00:48 2012

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] po' (was: wa'maH cha' jatlhwI'pu' po'qu' chaH 'Iv'e'?)

De'vID jonpIn ([email protected])



De'vID:
>> So there's a TKD floating around out there somewhere with a
>> canonicalised error.

Philip Newton:
> Hm, is it really canonicalised?
>
> Perhaps it could be compared with the pronunciations of actors on
> takes that didn't make it into the final film: they exist but they
> don't (IMO) form canon; they are irrelevant.
>
> And an admitted error should not - again IMO - form canon, either.

A poor choice of wording on my part.  MO has made errors in canon,
which we all recognise as errors (like {Hagh} instead of {HaD} in
TKD).  By "canonicalised" I don't mean that it's good Klingon, only
that it's part of the "Okrandian canon", which certainly includes
errors.

-- 
De'vID

_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol



Back to archive top level