- Qov At 01:56 '?????' 6/6/2012, De'vID jonpIn wrote:
Qov: >>> qepHomwIjDaq jatlh ghojwI', "chay' <125,000> jIjatlh?" *{wa' chorghvI' 'uy'} No, not really, but I wish *{-vI'} generalised in this way (from {vatlhvI'}). qurgh: >> wa'bIp cha'netlh vaghSaD Qov: > That makes sense. Is that canonical, qurgh? Why else would we have {bIp} and {netlh}? -- De'vID _______________________________________________ Tlhingan-hol mailing list [email protected] http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
_______________________________________________ Tlhingan-hol mailing list [email protected] http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol