tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jul 17 18:32:15 2012

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' cha'vatlh cha'maH vagh: jorbe' nachDu'

Rohan Fenwick - QeS 'utlh ([email protected])

From: Rohan Fenwick - QeS 'utlh <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' cha'vatlh cha'maH vagh: jorbe' nachDu'
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 11:32:03 +1000
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
List-archive: <http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol/>
List-id: <tlhingan-hol.stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
List-subscribe: <http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
References: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>

ghItlhpu' Qov, jatlh:
> vajar SumDaq SuvtaH Qoreq Sogh.

jang ghunchu'wI', jatlh:
> Here, "near Vajar" would probably have to be {vajar retlhDaq}. The only other
> options I can think of would involve changing the sentence structure to make
> room for {Sum} as the main verb.

I agree that {vajar retlhDaq} is probably the best option here, but {SuvtaH
Qoreq Sogh SumtaHvIS vajar} might be another way of keeping Sum in a subordinate
clause.

QeS 'utlh
 		 	   		  
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol

References:
- Re: [Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' cha'vatlh cha'maH vagh: jorbe' nachDu'
  - From: "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' cha'vatlh wejmaH loS: SalDI' lojmIt
Next by Date: [Tlhingan-hol] Klingon Word of the Day: jaQ
Previous by thread: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' cha'vatlh cha'maH vagh: jorbe' nachDu'
Next by thread: [Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' cha'vatlh wejmaH loS: SalDI' lojmIt
Index(es):