tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jan 19 19:17:36 2012
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' wa'vatlh cha'maH jav: <vuv 'a tlhoch>
At 18:49 19/01/2012, you wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Qov <[email protected]> wrote:
> QuSchugh, po'qu' QuSwI'pu' 'ej DevwI' Seng qotlh.
DevwI' Seng qotlh 'Iv?
luqotlh. Qaghna' 'oH.
> jatlh Hota'ro', "...DaH yaS wa'DIch DaSugh net tuch."
<Sugh> vIqawbe'mo' mu'ghomDaq vInejnIS. lut Dabogh mu'tay' qeq vItIv.
'e' vIHech. lut DacherghtaHmo' pop Daqotlh.
> <muvoqchu'bogh jup vIvoqchu'bogh[107] vIwIvnIS> 'e' Qub.
The {'e'} doesn't seem right, but I have no problems with the
head-sharing relative clauses.
I would love {Qub} to behave as a verb of saying, but with no
evidence that it is one, then what can it do but take an SAO with {'e'}?
> jatlh Hota'ro', "HoD jIHchugh, Qochbogh yaS wa'DIch vInej. vuDmeywIj'e'
> vISov."
cha' vuD QaQ law' wa' vuD QaQ puS, vabDot potlhqu'chugh HoD vuD.
[mu'vam chu' luqelbogh vuDmey vIloS]
I really want a word meaning "in that manner". Will {jaSHa'} work?
That seems to be the way vabDot works.
> mon vajar. QochtaH 'e' tIv Hota'ro' 'a qIQbe'law'. chaq muj Sa'.
muj 'e' vItul. Qaq vay' 'e' vIHarbe' 'e' vImaS.
tuq wuq vajar. DawuqnIS SoH.
- Qov
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol