tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Nov 30 07:01:43 2011
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Noun cases
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 15:13, David Trimboli <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 11/30/2011 8:20 AM, Michael Everson wrote:
>>
>> Klingon doesn't have declensions; it's agglutinative.
>
> Agglutination and declension are mutually exclusive? Isn't the inflection of
> a noun by agglutinative suffixes a declension?
Also, if we take "declension" to be "declension class" (as in "the
Latin fourth declension"), Klingon arguably has that, too... three
noun classes, each with its own separate form of the plural marker
-mey -Du' -pu'. And with each noun belonging to a specific class,
yielding things such as {jIb Ho'Du'} even though the teeth of a comb
are not (usually...) a body part.
But then there is {tIqpu'}, and the "scattered all about" of {puqmey}
and the like, which makes such a Latinate analysis messy.
Cheers,
Philip
--
Philip Newton <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol