tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Nov 25 15:10:33 2009

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: long sentence (was Re: pu'jIn)

ghunchu'wI' ([email protected])

From: "ghunchu'wI'" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: long sentence (was Re: pu'jIn)
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:10:19 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <C305E6BD33E2654DAE1F8F403247B6A6011382A8826B@EVS02.ad.uchicago.edu> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Nov 25, 2009, at 3:28 PM, Lieven Litaer wrote:

> ...mu'tlheghmey'e' tIqqu'...
> PS: mistakes are possible, but should not be there ;-)

reH DuH Qaghmey.  motlh DIjunlaHbe' 'e' vItu'.
DIp DelDI' wot, DelmeH wotDaq 'arghnIS Segh vagh mojaq: {mu'tlheghmey  
tIqqu''e'}
('ej lugh <DoD> lo'lIj 'e' vIHon.  chaq qaq <chevwI'>, 'ach  
muvlaw'mo' 'op chevwI'qoq ghaytan Qapchu'be'.)

mu'tlheghlIj tInqu' vIlaDta'.  rut tlhaQbej mughwI' Qu'.

-- ghunchu'wI'

References:
- RE: pu'jIn
  - From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
- RE: pu'jIn
  - From: Terrence Donnelly <[email protected]>
- Re: pu'jIn
  - From: Christopher Doty <[email protected]>
- Re: pu'jIn
  - From: David Trimboli <[email protected]>
- Re: pu'jIn
  - From: Christopher Doty <[email protected]>
- Re: pu'jIn
  - From: David Trimboli <[email protected]>
- Re: pu'jIn
  - From: Christopher Doty <[email protected]>
- Re: pu'jIn
  - From: David Trimboli <[email protected]>
- Re: pu'jIn
  - From: Christopher Doty <[email protected]>
- Re: pu'jIn
  - From: "ghunchu'wI'" <[email protected]>
- long sentence (was Re: pu'jIn)
  - From: "Lieven Litaer" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: The topic marker -'e'
Next by Date: Re: The topic marker -'e'
Previous by thread: Re: long sentence (was Re: pu'jIn)
Next by thread: Re: pu'jIn
Index(es):