tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Nov 23 17:13:26 2009

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: The topic marker -'e'

ghunchu'wI' ([email protected])

From: "ghunchu'wI'" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: The topic marker -'e'
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:12:31 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Nov 23, 2009, at 7:36 PM, Christopher Doty wrote:

> I am rather tired of debating this point.  If Klingon for the Galactic
> Traveller outlines things that Klingons "actually" say which Okrand
> labels "ungrammatical," he is using a softer definition equivalent to
> "improper" or "incorrect."

toH!  rapbe' qechmey Dayajlaw'bogh, mu'mey lo'bogh Marc Okrand je.   
DaH chaq ngoDvam Dalajqang.

-- ghunchu'wI'

References:
- The topic marker -'e'
  - From: Tracy Canfield <[email protected]>
- Re: The topic marker -'e'
  - From: Christopher Doty <[email protected]>
- Re: The topic marker -'e'
  - From: Steven Lytle <[email protected]>
- Re: The topic marker -'e'
  - From: Christopher Doty <[email protected]>
- Re: The topic marker -'e'
  - From: Steven Lytle <[email protected]>
- Re: The topic marker -'e'
  - From: Christopher Doty <[email protected]>
- Re: The topic marker -'e'
  - From: AndrÃ MÃller <[email protected]>
- Re: The topic marker -'e'
  - From: Christopher Doty <[email protected]>
- Re: The topic marker -'e'
  - From: AndrÃ MÃller <[email protected]>
- Re: The topic marker -'e'
  - From: "ghunchu'wI'" <[email protected]>
- Re: The topic marker -'e'
  - From: Christopher Doty <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Question about -wI'
Next by Date: Re: The topic marker -'e'
Previous by thread: Re: The topic marker -'e'
Next by thread: Re: The topic marker -'e'
Index(es):