tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Nov 23 13:24:08 2009

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: The topic marker -'e'

ghunchu'wI' 'utlh ([email protected])

From: "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: The topic marker -'e'
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:22:56 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 4:10 PM, David Trimboli <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thematic relations are not discretely separated the way syntactic roles
> are. Linguists will often disagree on the role of a noun in a sentence,
> or even the names of the various roles.

vaj maQoch maH net chaw'ba', 'ej lI'be' ja'chuqghach.
permeyvam vISaHbe'mo' jIjeS rIntaH.

pablu'meH QaQ jajvam! pabmo' ghoHlu'meH...not Somuch.

-- ghunchu'wI'

Follow-Ups:
- Re: The topic marker -'e'
  - From: David Trimboli <[email protected]>

References:
- The topic marker -'e'
  - From: Tracy Canfield <[email protected]>
- Re: The topic marker -'e'
  - From: Christopher Doty <[email protected]>
- Re: The topic marker -'e'
  - From: Steven Lytle <[email protected]>
- Re: The topic marker -'e'
  - From: Christopher Doty <[email protected]>
- Re: The topic marker -'e'
  - From: "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <[email protected]>
- Re: The topic marker -'e'
  - From: Tracy Canfield <[email protected]>
- Re: The topic marker -'e'
  - From: "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <[email protected]>
- Re: The topic marker -'e'
  - From: David Trimboli <[email protected]>
- Re: The topic marker -'e'
  - From: "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <[email protected]>
- Re: The topic marker -'e'
  - From: David Trimboli <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: tesseraktik
Next by Date: Re: Question about -wI'
Previous by thread: tesseraktik
Next by thread: Re: The topic marker -'e'
Index(es):