tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Jun 20 13:29:38 2009
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Once more into the ship in which I fled
- From: McArdle <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Once more into the ship in which I fled
- Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:28:04 -0700 (PDT)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1245529684; bh=PhYPpGhalwmVBilkQUsUlR8HqUiXSGCg7+JX51whA5k=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=yvqEmXE7F/gZKS81BAoB9RPpvtqsw0K4aBILXI1jmuRYBFOQ1jIGHHqUdsHBtna1QzSLdnFGJHzZTN/BFhH2l7uSf8lXRTfE+v620NJEsKJVMrJdfQW37pQFZPmS7Ad6BP6Eos4wqwdaf+l2lrGDrMSBzlazCnH1eGaCmyz5P28=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=JZJuCb7nflZfMOlXOzuUTtBV/rnDu02MhAMnaDWH8t5CdHVXFwT15j534s0WnXf1C50fGIb0FkWfJPx63i9HvCiVdFIwBGIHoQAHc8lYbfN6fK+ksZe/5GYE0ZpkhnfaJBCSB3Vv6HADUkU733eO9BCROvVnRh3M/XLVwPPiKLs=;
--- On Sat, 6/20/09, Rohan F <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Rohan F <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Once more into the ship in which I fled
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Saturday, June 20, 2009, 11:48 AM
>
>
> MO: In fact it shouldn't! I don't think Klingon fits into
> this hierarchy. Well,
> it does, if you want to look at it that way. I couldn't
> make the {bogh} thing
> work for me with anything other than subject or object.
>
If this statement is to be believed, there must have been a time when MO _wanted_ Klingon to support relative clauses with non-core head nouns. I wonder if he ever considered the type of solution I proposed, and, if so, why he rejected it. It certainly seems (IMHO) to be one way to "make the {bogh} thing work".
Qapla'