tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Jul 21 06:45:36 2007

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: using {Hoch} (was Re: Wool? In tlhIngan Hol?)

Robyn Stewart ([email protected])

• From: Robyn Stewart <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: using {Hoch} (was Re: Wool? In tlhIngan Hol?)
• Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 06:43:47 -0700
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

At 10:48 PM 7/20/2007, you wrote:
> > >Partitive:  If you're talking about "all of" a single thing, it looks
> > >like the {Hoch} comes second.  The {HochHom} example is the best
> > >evidence I know of to support that interpretation.  If you can
> > >replace the word "all" by "entirety", do it that way: {SuvwI' Hoch}
> > >"the entirety of the warrior", "the warrior's all".
> >
> > ghunchu'wI' is spot on WRT how {Hoch} works, although his
> > example {SuvwI'
> > Hoch}, though grammatical, sounds a bit odd.
>
>I always use the noun chab when demonstrating Hoch.

Can you give those translations to distinguish?

>Hoch chab
>Hoch chabmey
>chab Hoch
>chab naQ
>naQbogh chab Hoch
>naQbe'bogh chab Hoch

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: using {Hoch} (was Re: Wool? In tlhIngan Hol?)
    • From: "DloraH" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: using {Hoch} (was Re: Wool? In tlhIngan Hol?)
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
  • RE: using {Hoch} (was Re: Wool? In tlhIngan Hol?)
    • From: "DloraH" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Avoid enhancement pills
• Next by Date: cheap oem soft shipping //orldwide
• Previous by thread: RE: using {Hoch} (was Re: Wool? In tlhIngan Hol?)
• Next by thread: RE: using {Hoch} (was Re: Wool? In tlhIngan Hol?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level