tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Feb 22 04:44:30 2007
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Dilbert Comic in Klingon for February 10, 2007
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: Dilbert Comic in Klingon for February 10, 2007
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 07:43:04 EST
In a message dated 2/21/2007 9:26:53 PM Central Standard Time,
[email protected] writes:
> It seems to me that what Dilbert
> wants to say is {jIchenHa'moH} "I will become destroyed", but is this
> grammatical? There seems no example of {chen} without an object.
{jIchenHa'moH} means 'I (will/do/did) destroy' (to use your gloss), not 'I
will become destroyed'.
{chen} takes no object, while {chenmoH} always has an object, even if it's
only implied.
lay'tel SIvten