tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Dec 11 22:05:38 2007
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Prefix and noun agreement (was: usage of type-7 aspect suffix {-pu})
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: Prefix and noun agreement (was: usage of type-7 aspect suffix {-pu})
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 01:03:14 EST
In a message dated 12/10/2007 12:52:55 PM Central Standard Time,
[email protected] writes:
> I know it's explicitly stated. That's how I can use it as a
> demonstration of why proper Klingon (or even colloqial Klingon!) isn't
> always that which makes the most sense. The point is that if "making
> sense" were the only criteria for acceptable Klingon, you'd have to
> throw out a lot of perfectly good, nonsensical rules.
>
You're calling these rules nonsensical, but they aren't.
That's what threw me off, I think.
lay'tel SIvten </HTML>