tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Sep 14 12:39:26 2006
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: question about position of suffixes
- From: Terrence Donnelly <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KLBC: question about position of suffixes
- Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=zzt1Tahksr5Rz9RjdnDFlMiAooBND+okeF260zRWuPjnOR5zEFUCetX+sAwu2RcqtyvV5OgWZpsEBi9mCloQsOP06fqPqgV65meoincz/Tu/fC1vqT1TvSpzG0EZx+JUmU6rcoeotGE3YIDHVIjUvIPPna+9GPrBoj7/BTaChBw= ;
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
I believe the correct writing would be your second
example: {verengan Ha'DIbaH ghaH be'nalwI'
wa'DIch'e'}.
-- ter'eS BG
--- McArdle <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear BG,
>
> As I understand the relevant sections of the
> Klingon Dictionary, if I wanted to say "my wife is a
> Ferengi dog" (which, by the way, she's not) it would
> be
>
> verengan Ha'DIbaH ghaH be'nalwI''e'
>
> If I want to expand on this and say "my first
> wife", I add the word wa'DIch after be'nal. But
> where does it go relative to the possessive and
> topicalizing suffixes? Before them, between them or
> after them? Is it
>
> verengan Ha'DIbaH ghaH be'nalwI''e' wa'DIch ,
> verengan Ha'DIbaH ghaH be'nalwI' wa'DIch'e' , or
> verengan Ha'DIbaH ghaH be'nal wa'DIchwI''e'
>
> Or am I just totally out in left field here?
>
> Thanks.
>
> McA
>
> ---------------------------------
> Get your email and more, right on the new Yahoo.com
>
>
>
>