tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Nov 06 23:22:25 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: plurals

Lieven Litaer ([email protected])

• From: "Lieven Litaer" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: plurals
• Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 08:21:51 +0100
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>

{lom} definitely is a thing, since body *parts* are only *parts* of a body.
--> -Du' does not apply.

If I remember correctly, a corpse is dead, so cannot speak:
--> -pu' does not apply.

----> -mey is the correct plural suffix for corpses {lommey}.

> Is lom (corpse) a body part or a thing, and would -mey carry the 
> scattered-about connotation whn applid to it?

Quvar.
-- 
Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! 
Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer

• References:
  • plurals
    • From: "Elizabeth Lawrence" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: disagree
• Next by Date: Klingon WOTD: Hurgh (verb)
• Previous by thread: plurals
• Next by thread: Re: plurals
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level