tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Mar 27 14:13:53 2006
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: <Bloodwine> tlhIngan
- From: "QeS 'utlh" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: <Bloodwine> tlhIngan
- Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 08:13:41 +1000
- Bcc:
ghItlhpu' Shane MiQogh, ja':
>wejpuH... (probably the most unused word out there, i had to give it
>credit.)
If you think that's bad, just wait and see how often you get to use the verb
suffixes {-beH} and {-neS}. {{:)
>Doqqu'lu'chugh, 'e'be'lu' 'Iw tlhIngan. (If it is red, it is not klingon
>blood.)
Because you're talking about something specific - bloodwine, in this case -
then the indefinite subject suffix {-lu'} is inappropriate here. As well,
{'e'} can't function as a copular pronoun like {'oH}, {ghaH} and so on, and
therefore probably can't take verb suffixes; {'oH} should be used here. {'Iw
tlhIngan} should also be the other way around ({tlhIngan 'Iw}), because
noun-noun constructions work in the same way as they do in English, the
first noun describing the second:
tlhIngan 'Iw - Klingon blood
'Iw HIq - blood wine
So, incorporating all this: {Doqqu'chugh tlhIngan 'Iw 'oHbe'} "if it is red,
it is not Klingon blood".
>That brings up another idea of mine... is 'e'lu' even correct?
No. {'e'} isn't a verb, but a pronoun, and it can't be the pronoun in a
pronoun-as-verb construction, either.
QeS 'utlh
tlhIngan Hol yejHaD pabpo' / Grammarian of the Klingon Language Institute
not nItoj Hemey ngo' juppu' ngo' je
(Old roads and old friends will never deceive you)
- Ubykh Hol vIttlhegh
_________________________________________________________________
New year, new job ? there's more than 100,00 jobs at SEEK
http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fninemsn%2Eseek%2Ecom%2Eau&_t=752315885&_r=Jan05_tagline&_m=EXT