tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Mar 26 19:30:18 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: double-checking

DloraH ([email protected])

• From: "DloraH" <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: double-checking
• Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 21:30:01 -0600
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• Thread-index: AcZRSBPmDjzLny9vSHeQf8OOr6ySSwABhZWw

> In other words, use -ta' if there was intetion, and -pu' if 
> there wasn't, but use one of the 2, not both, nor exclude both.

-pu' does NOT say there was or was not intent.  It is neutral in that
regard.  It simply says that the verb is completed.

-ta' also says that the verb is completed, but it also states that verb took
place intentionally.


DloraH

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: double-checking
    • From: Shane MiQogh <[email protected]>

• References:
  • RE: double-checking
    • From: Shane MiQogh <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: double-checking
• Next by Date: RE: double-checking
• Previous by thread: RE: double-checking
• Next by thread: RE: double-checking
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level