tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jan 11 00:13:34 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: transitivity

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: transitivity
• Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:13:12 EST

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In a message dated 1/10/2006 9:19:19 PM Central Standard Time, 
[email protected] writes:


> So, the answer to the question "Is {jISop} transitive
> or 
> intransitive?" is "Both: {Sop} is always semantically
> bivalent/
> transitive; but {jISop} is grammatically
> univalent/intransitive."
> 
Another way of saying this is that the second semantic argument of 
grammatically univalent {jISop} is implied, unknown, or unimportant.

lay'tel SIvten

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: transitivity
    • From: Terrence Donnelly <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: transitivity
• Next by Date: Re: transitivity
• Previous by thread: transitivity
• Next by thread: Re: transitivity
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level