tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Dec 27 13:27:47 2006
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: HolQeD Republishing...
On the surface I would vote against it, since HolQeD is one of the
things members of the KLI receive as part of their membership. If HQ
articles were to appear on the web where anyone could get them, why
purchase a membership to the KLI? (present journal droughts aside, of
course)
I imagine that's what Lawrence would say ... but then, I'm not
Lawrence. He'd be the one whose opinion I'd seek on this matter.
-jI'qel ghojwI'
...Paul wrote:
> Quick note before I'm off to lunch (hence no Hol...)
>
> Anyone know if there are issues around putting up on the wiki the content
> of some of the more important articles that were published in the HolQeD?
> For example, in the same vein as the linguistic terms page, I was thinking
> of putting up the mathematical terms/syntax that was discussed in one of
> the really old issues (like volume 5 or something?) since I can never
> remember where I've seen that syntax, and I'm betting quite a few people
> probably don't have access to that issue...
>
> Likewise, I was thinking about trying to aggregate some of the other
> items, like the discussions about quantities (using /Hoch/ before/after,
> how to use the word for 'half', etc...)
>
> ...Paul
>
> ** ...Paul, [email protected], Insane Engineer **
> ** Visit Project Galactic Guide http://www.galactic-guide.com/ **
> "We must become the change we want to see" -- Mahatma Gandhi
>
>
>
>