tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Apr 02 17:55:48 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: more Okuda pIqaD?

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: more Okuda pIqaD?
• Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 20:55:30 EDT

In a message dated 4/2/2006 7:51:17 PM Central Standard Time, 
[email protected] writes:

> Artificial languages require some sort of a grammar lesson, otherwise 
> they're irrelevant cause no one speaks them except the creator. This goes for 
> Klingon as well. TKD provides quite a resource for lessons.
> 

DaH jIyajlaw'. I think I see now.  
Grammar yes, lessons no.  Since most conlangs are not meant to be learned by 
hordes of people, their inventors don't usually write lessons for them, even 
though they do write grammars for them.
Marc Okrand didn't write any lessons for Klingon, though.  Other people did 
that.

Most artificial languages are irrelevant to anyone except their creator, with 
or without lessons.  Whether the language is relevant or not is irrelevant.  

lay'tel SIvten

• Prev by Date: Re: more Okuda pIqaD?
• Next by Date: Klingon WOTD: mer (verb)
• Previous by thread: Re: more Okuda pIqaD?
• Next by thread: Klingon WOTD: moH (verb)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level