tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Oct 04 17:13:03 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: ??Hoch Satlho'qu'

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: ??Hoch Satlho'qu'
• Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 20:11:40 EDT

In a message dated 2004-10-04 6:51:41 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:

> >Hoch Satlhoqu'!
> 
> qaSlaH'a' wanI'vam?
> 
> mu'tlhegh DoS {SoH} 'oSbogh DIpvaD tam moHaq lo'laH'a' vay' SaHtaHvIS 
> mu'tlhegh DoS mu' naQ neH (vaj {'oH} {ghaH} ghap 'oSnISbogh mu')?
> 
> Is this possible? Can one have a second person direct object pronoun prefix 
> when there's only an explicit direct object (therefore third person)?
> 
> QeS lagh
> 

qechvam yIqel:  Hoch!  Satho'qu'!  

lay'tel SIvten

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: ??Hoch Satlho'qu'
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: ??Hoch Satlho'qu'
• Next by Date: Klingon WOTD: chuyDaH (n-pl)
• Previous by thread: Re: ??Hoch Satlho'qu'
• Next by thread: Re: ??Hoch Satlho'qu'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level