tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon May 24 11:01:59 2004
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: paghHu'/paghleS
- From: "De'vID jonwI'" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: paghHu'/paghleS
- Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 14:01:22 -0400
- Bcc:
lay'tel SIvten:
>I overstated when I said that I gave the words a novel meaning. I pointed
>out the OBVIOUS meanings of these latent words.
>
>TKD states that {pagh} is a numeral when it means 'zero'.
>
>Everybody seems agreed that the 'day' words mean "today". Words with {Hu'}
>can't have a future meaning, and words with {leS} can't have a past
>meaning. Put the two together and you have words like {paghHu'} and
>{paghleS}. Whether I say that's what they mean or not, that IS what they
>mean. Okrand has given us the words AND the grammar, and this is the
>result.
<DaHjaj> lu'oS neH <paghHu'> <paghleS> je 'e' Damaqchugh,
ghaytan SoHvaD Qochbe'wI' law' law' QochwI' law' puS. mu'mey
ghoQ, bom mu'mey joq bIH neH 'e' Damaqchugh, ghaytan Qoch pagh.
'ach <DaHjaj 'ej 'eq> 'oS <paghHu'> 'ej <DaHjaj 'ej paS> 'oS
<paghleS> 'e' Damaqta'. qechmeyvam ngaSbe' pab. qechmeyvam
Da'ogh neH.
'ach chay' <HochHu'> <paghleS> bochov? boyaj'a' 'ej pab'a' bIH?
--
De'vID
_________________________________________________________________
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN Premium
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines