tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Mar 01 11:00:47 2004
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: RE: Segh Soch mojaq <<-pu'>>
Quvar (levinius@gmx.de)
![[Hol ghojwI'] [Hol ghojwI']](/pics/level2_big.png)
- From: Lieven L. Litaer (Quvar) <levinius@gmx.de>
- Subject: Re: RE: Segh Soch mojaq <<-pu'>>
- Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 19:55:32 +0100
- In-reply-to: <BAY15-F14n64cbI5Ylr00030385@hotmail.com>
Am 01.03.2004 14:04:03, schrieb "QeS lagh" <qeslagh@hotmail.com>:
>I don't object to this. It looks OK from my (admittedly not very
>experienced) point of view. (Maybe it just sounds weird because there are a
>whole bunch of <pu'>s in it, but nothing's wrong with it grammatically that
It feels weird to me not because of all the {-pu'}, but because I feel uncomfortable using a pronoun like
a verb.
One other thing, the standard structure of "A is B" is {B 'oH A'e'}
TKD 6.3:
<<<
If the subject is a noun, it follows the third-person pronoun ({ghaH} "he/she," {'oH} "it," {chaH}
"they," {bIH} "they") and takes the {-'e'} "topic" suffix.
>>>
{puq ghaH loD'e'} - surely correct.
{puq ghaHbogh loD'e'} - probably correct.
"the man who is the child"
{puq'e' ghaHbogh loD} - correct?.
"the child who the man is"
Now I look back at TKD 6.3 and get confused with the placement of {-'e'}. On the other hand, I
remember there was something with -bogh and the topic marker -'e'...
Quvar.
qaponQo' - HIpon SoH.
Back to KLI Home Page