tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jan 05 13:20:38 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

jatyIn (was Re: bogh puqbe'ma')

Philip Newton ([email protected])

• From: Philip Newton <[email protected]>
• Subject: jatyIn (was Re: bogh puqbe'ma')
• Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 20:26:42 +0100
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
• Organization: very little
• References: <[email protected]>

On Sun, 04 Jan 2004 19:35:34 +0000, "Agnieszka Solska"
<[email protected]> wrote:

> pIvjaj jatyIn je.

nuq 'oS mu' «jatyIn»?

mu'ghom vIlo'chugh «spiritual possession» vISam, 'ach qech vIyajbe'chu'.

peQIj!

Philip

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: jatyIn (was Re: bogh puqbe'ma')
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: bogh puqbe'ma'
    • From: "Agnieszka Solska" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Possessive pronouns
• Next by Date: Re: Does {teb} appear anywhere in canon?
• Prev by thread: Re: bogh puqbe'ma'
• Next by thread: Re: jatyIn (was Re: bogh puqbe'ma')
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level