tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jan 02 19:58:34 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

paSlogh wa'

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: paSlogh wa'
• Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 21:04:23 EST

In a message dated 2004-01-02 2:12:25 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
[email protected] as Philip (I think) writes:


> Since {paSlogh} is glossed as "socks" in TKD, I presume it's an
> inherently plural noun like {ngop} or {cha}.
> 
might it not be that {paSlogh} means "pair of socks", thus being a singular 
noun with its own plural?  the english translation of "socks" is still 
accurate, but misleading.  and doesn't tell us how to say singular "sock", although 
"one of the socks" or "half a pair of socks" is a possibility.  
lay'tel SIvten

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: paSlogh wa'
    • From: "Lieven Litaer" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: ghu pong
• Next by Date: polish klingon list
• Prev by thread: Re: ghu pong
• Next by thread: Re: paSlogh wa'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level