tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Feb 24 14:54:46 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

[tlhIngan-Hol] Re: «law'qu'» rur «'Iq». «puSqu'» rur nuq?

Quvar ([email protected])

• From: Lieven L. Litaer (Quvar) <[email protected]>
• Subject: [tlhIngan-Hol] Re: «law'qu'» rur «'Iq». «puSqu'» rur nuq?
• Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 23:54:58 +0100
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>

Am 24.02.2004 17:14:39, schrieb Steven Boozer <[email protected]>:

>In light of this, I think {puSqu'} "be very few" is as close as we can get 
>to "too few, less than there should be" for the time being... unless you 

closer: tlhoy puS

Quvar.

• Follow-Ups:
  • [tlhIngan-Hol] Re: «law'qu'» rur «'Iq». «puSqu'» rur nuq?
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [tlhIngan-Hol] Re: Need a translation -newbie
• Next by Date: [tlhIngan-Hol] Re: yuch watlh 'ej Human jat
• Previous by thread: [tlhIngan-Hol] Re: KLBC: default aspect?
• Next by thread: [tlhIngan-Hol] Re: «law'qu'» rur «'Iq». «puSqu'» rur nuq?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level