tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Feb 12 10:30:05 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: toQDujwIj vIQaw'law'

Steven Boozer ([email protected])

• From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: toQDujwIj vIQaw'law'
• Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 09:19:45 -0600
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
• References: <PLJH3YFDZTXV21A51UA9D1TKIDB94RL.402b521e@quvar>

Voragh:
> >>                             it turns out that we already have the
> >>perfect word: {QanwI'}  "guard" (lit. "protector"), the protective
> >>armor plating around a wing cannon on - wait for it! - a {toQDuj}!

Quvar:
> > Sorry for asking again, is this a canon definition, or yours?

ngabwI':
>It's canon. From the BoP poster, technical callout #31: {tal QanwI'} "Cannon
>Guard"

Just so Quvar is clear, "protective armor plating" is my own definition 
based on what is shown on the poster.  Since it's prefaced by {tal} 
"cannon", I assume that there are other things a {QanwI'} can protect {Qan}.



-- 
Voragh
Ca'Non Master of the Klingons 

• References:
  • Re: toQDujwIj vIQaw'law'
    • From: Lieven L. Litaer (Quvar) <[email protected]>
  • Re: toQDujwIj vIQaw'law'
    • From: "Scott Willis" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: taghwI' jIH
• Next by Date: Re: Klingon WOTD: boD (n-body)
• Prev by thread: Re: toQDujwIj vIQaw'law'
• Next by thread: Klingon WOTD: juH (n)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level