tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Apr 27 06:12:33 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Klingon WOTD: jaH (v)

Scott Willis ([email protected])

• From: "Scott Willis" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Klingon WOTD: jaH (v)
• Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 09:07:52 -0400
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dar'Qang" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 11:00 PM
Subject: Re: Klingon WOTD: jaH (v)


> At 12:04 PM 4/21/2004, Voragh wrote:
>
>
> >    jolpa'Daq yIjaH
> >    (Clipped: jolpa' yIjaH)
> >    Go to the transport room! TKD
>
> [...]
>
> As I understand the WM / MO interview that was part of the post, {jolpa'
> yIjaH} would be grammatical without being clipped.  Did I misread?

No, you're right, but as was pointed out in the recent "verbs of motion
thread", the WM/MO interview took place after the publication of TKD.

--ngabwI'
Beginners' Grammarian,
Klingon Language Institute
http://kli.org/
HovpoH 701466.8

• References:
  • Re: Klingon WOTD: jaH (v)
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
  • Re: Klingon WOTD: jaH (v)
    • From: Dar'Qang <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Holtej on the radio
• Next by Date: Re: De'wI' mu'mey
• Previous by thread: Re: Klingon WOTD: jaH (v)
• Next by thread: Re: Klingon WOTD: jaH (v)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level