tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu May 22 23:38:31 2003
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Opposite of -wI'
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: Opposite of -wI'
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 00:34:26 EDT
It does seem possible that the Klingon verb stem can have suffixes preceeding
-wI'. Some do not appear quite logical. About 6 years ago, Mark Shoulson
said that using both -lu' and -wI' would not work.
I can see that -chuq is a problem. -neS just doesn't do much.
But, -choH, -qa', -nIS, -vIp, -qang, -rup, -beH, -laH, -taH, -lI', pu', -ta'
all appear to have limited possibilities. I'd like to see comments and
thoughts about this for a while. I don't see any reason to claim that they can work
at all times.
peHruS