tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jan 22 11:38:59 2003

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: RE: latlh tlhegh tIcheltaH!

• From: Quvar valer <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: RE: latlh tlhegh tIcheltaH!
• Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 16:57:48 +0100
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

>> jatlh SuStel:
>> >bIjangDI', mu'meylIj mu'mey Dajangbogh je Dachevbe'.  laDmeH Qu' 
>> DaQatlhmoH.
>> >latlh tlhegh yIchel!  SoHvaD jI'ang:

ghItlh DloraH:
>ghomvam yInuD.  SuStel mu' vIHmoH De'wI' (tIqqu'mo' tlhegh).
>toH, [DaQatlhmoH] ghItlh 'Iv?  SuStel SoH ghap?

bIlugh. DaS numISmoHba' De'wI'.
choponchu'pu'.
DaH tlhegh chIm vIchelrup. :-)

Quvar
  ghojwI'pu'lI' tISaH

• References:
  • RE: latlh tlhegh tIcheltaH!
    • From: "DloraH" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: RE: "to be" and plurals
• Next by Date: Re: "to be" and plurals
• Prev by thread: RE: latlh tlhegh tIcheltaH!
• Next by thread: Klingon WOTD: jej (v)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level