tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Sep 08 12:35:20 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: EK: ghomqa'ghach
ghItlh "DloraH" <[email protected]>:
>DIp 'oHbe' nuq? Qovpatlh? TKD p178
>lugh mu'tlheghvam
It's called "exclamations", I always thought the cannot be used like nouns, only as "sentences in their
own right": {petaQ!!} and not {toDSaH ghaHbej.} (I asked for that several years ago)
>I don't know any canon for /tlhe'/.
There seems to be none yet.
>this can't be used as evidence for /tlhe'/;
>but I think /matlhe'/ is ok.
I think {matlhe''egh} is ok. ;-)
chaq. net Sovlu' pagh [sic!!]
Quvar.