tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Oct 16 22:38:48 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Tao Te Ching Chp. 54

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Tao Te Ching Chp. 54
• Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 22:39:03 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>

ja' 'ISqu':
>[C]: {'IqchoHbej  / law'choHbej ghoblIj}: I admit to having doubts if a verb
>glossed as "be many, numerous" can be applied to describe an uncountable
>noun. If not, I'll need to look for a different word.

Skybox S32 {'oy'naQ} "Painstik" ends with this sentence:

    chIch vay' 'oy'moHmeH 'oy'naQ 'ul law' tlhuD 'oH.

If {'ul} is uncountable, {law'} works the way you want it to.

-- ghunchu'wI'

• References:
  • Tao Te Ching Chp. 54
    • From: "Agnieszka Solska" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Tao Te Ching; Chp. 47 (naQ)
• Next by Date: reH (was: RE: Tao Te Ching; Chp. 47 (naQ))
• Prev by thread: Tao Te Ching Chp. 54
• Next by thread: RE: Tao Te Ching Chp. 54
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level