tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Mar 24 23:52:53 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: [KLBC] loQ jIqeqnIS neH
> qavan DloraH,
Perhaps a , should be put in there because DloraH is not the subject.
qavan, DloraH.
> qaStaHvIS 'op poH tlhIngan Hol vIghoj,
'op poH? jarmey? wa' DIS? vagh DIS?
> 'ej vaj pIj jIqeqnIS 'e' vIwuqta'.
TKD p66: ...the second verb never takes an aspect suffix.
So we can't have /'e' vIwuqta'/
> tlhIngan Hol vIghojchu' vIneH, choyaj'a'?
HIja'
> QaghmeywIj Dangu'laH'a' 'ej
> choHmey DachuplaH'a'? 'ej yIyuDHa'chu'! jIghojmeH HIboQneS!
majQa'
DloraH, BG