tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Mar 13 00:16:40 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: Higher numbers
- From: GusDog <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KLBC: Higher numbers
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 23:39:05 -0500
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011128 Netscape6/6.2.1
> hmm, yes, you are correct... but maybe they're as relaxed with number forming
> words as we are. In (American) English, eleven hundred is the same as one
> thousand one hundred.
teH. wa' DoS wIqIp.
>>Another question: do we really have no number-forming elements higher
>>than 'million'-- {'uy'} ?
>>
>
> I'm very certain that klingon has such words... we just don't know them yet.
maj! qatlho'!
-ghuStargh