tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Feb 07 13:30:53 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: bopar'a'?

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: bopar'a'?
• Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2002 13:30:52 -0500 (EST)
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>
• User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.6

> QapDI' may', not nab pablu'chu', 'ach not Qap may', nabbe'lu'chugh je.

-DI' implies when {not nab pablu'chu'} happens.  I don't read any cause/effect 
here.  The second sentence has the cause/effect with -chugh. 

Either:
 Put a -chugh in the first sentence
   Qap may', not nab pablu'chu'chugh...
Or:
 Perhaps use -meH in the first phrase and a -nIS in the second phrase
   QapmeH may', not nab pabnISlu'chu'...


oops, is that recasting?


DloraH

• References:
  • bopar'a'?
    • From: Andrew Strader <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: subjects in complex sentences
• Next by Date: RE: Translating into Klingon
• Prev by thread: Re: bopar'a'?
• Next by thread: Re: bopar'a'?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level