tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Feb 02 18:41:18 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: A -moH suggestion
- From: "qe'San \(temp ADSL email\)" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: A -moH suggestion
- Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 23:45:27 -0000
-- Original Message -- From: <[email protected]>
>
> jatlh SuStel:
>
> > I'd like to suggest that /-moH/ shouldn't cause your
> > brain to do backflips when trying to understand it.
> > These two sentences should "feel" the same when
> > you read them:
[--snipped--]
> There is a bit of a problem if you try to say, "I'll teach
> you Klingon language." It looks like "you" and
> "Klingon language" are both objects of {ghojmoH}. In this
> case, the verb "teach" is "ditransitive", meaning that it
> has two objects, though Klingon doesn't really have a
> place in its grammar for two direct objects. That's when
> it is good to remember that {ghojmoH} is {ghoj} plus {-moH}.
>
> When I teach you, I cause you to learn. I don't cause
> the Klingon Language to learn. The cleanest, least
> controversial way to say, "I'll teach you Klingon
> language," is to split it up into smaller sentences, like:
>
> qaghojmoH. tlhIngan Hol wIHaD.
Excuse my insanity here but I'm sure it someone said that [noun-'e'] can be
treated as a header noun... IF that's correct it would seem to me to make
sense for a sentence like this to just be:
tlhIngan Hol'e' qaghojmoH
I teach you, (as to) Klingon Language
or in an example where O & S are specified
tlhIngan Hol'e' loDHom ghojmoH powI'
> [--snipped--]
>
> charghwI'
> 'utlh
qe'San
(PS. Sorry if anyone got this but I waited over 6 hours before resending it
to the list)