tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Dec 03 08:53:51 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: qepHom cha'DIch (KLBC probably needed)

• From: "QantoH" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: qepHom cha'DIch (KLBC probably needed)
• Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 15:56:50 +0100
• References: <PLMIDCYWQPKE83A9BAJPDCTPOWUPK.3deb183c@quvar> <002301c29adb$07d65ec0$657ba8c0@duke>

oops, I already found a mistake for myself :)

> Dunqu'bej qepHom. SaHtaHvIS tlhIngan HolvaD Sovmeyqu' vISoqpu'bej. tugh
qepHom lughajqa' 'e' vItul.

prefix error in the last sentence...
qepHom wIghajqa' 'e' vItul.

QantoH

• References:
  • qepHom cha'DIch
    • From: Quvar valer <[email protected]>
  • Re: qepHom cha'DIch (KLBC probably needed)
    • From: "QantoH" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: qepHom cha'DIch (KLBC probably needed)
• Next by Date: Re: qepHom cha'DIch (KLBC probably needed)
• Prev by thread: Re: qepHom cha'DIch (KLBC probably needed)
• Next by thread: Re: qepHom cha'DIch (KLBC probably needed)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level