tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Apr 17 05:53:07 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: to' nech

From: "Sean M. Burke" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: to' nech
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 03:52:42 -0600
In-Reply-To: <a0510030ab8e29f59cb81@[10.0.1.6]>
References: <[email protected]><[email protected]><a0510030bb8df487fc6e7@[10.0.1.2]><[email protected]>

At 23:48 2002-04-16 -0500, Alan Anderson wrote:
>At least let me know you have read my plea for you to start writing in
>Klingon instead of translating odd phrases and claiming poetic license when
>you drastically change the meaning.  Even if you don't agree, I'd
>appreciate some indication that the words actually are reaching your eyes.

Request denied.  Your inability to form any intelligent interpretation of 
the To' Nech (which you call "acontextual", because of /your/ inability to 
implicate the contexts) demonstrates that you are firmly in the class of 
people whose opinions do not matter, no matter how often they are claimed 
to be fact.

--
Sean M. Burke    http://www.spinn.net/~sburke/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: to' nech
  - From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: to' nech, 019: {jev'a'meyna'.}
  - From: "Sean M. Burke" <[email protected]>
- to' nech, 019: {jev'a'meyna'.}
  - From: "Sean M. Burke" <[email protected]>
- Re: to' nech, 019: {jev'a'meyna'.}
  - From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
- Re: to' nech
  - From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Sean's Translations
Next by Date: Re: to' nech, 019: {jev'a'meyna'.}
Prev by thread: Re: to' nech
Next by thread: Re: to' nech
Index(es):