tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Apr 16 00:51:09 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: ba'

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: ba'
• Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 00:51:03 EDT

In a message dated 4/15/2002 10:38:50 PM Mountain Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:


>  term Aorist comes 

I'd better not wait.  

If I recall correctly, Aorist refers to a tense.  We all know tlhIngan Hol 
does not employ tenses.

So, what I meant:  Unmarked tlhIngan Hol verbs appear to me as being 
"general."

peHruS

• Prev by Date: Re: ba'
• Next by Date: Re: "be'be'" - double negation
• Prev by thread: Re: ba'
• Next by thread: May they (not) be oblique
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level